<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reputation Repair Versus Reputation Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/</link>
	<description>The Online Reputation Management Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-31742</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-31742</guid>
		<description>for sure, reputation management is cheaper! &lt;br&gt;The thing we can&#039;t estimate is public opinion. Some crisis are so strong that even if in google and msn engines, reputation is good, it doesn&#039;t really cancel reputation in people mind. That&#039;s the second reason why I agree with you...proactive reputation is essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for sure, reputation management is cheaper! <br />The thing we can&#39;t estimate is public opinion. Some crisis are so strong that even if in google and msn engines, reputation is good, it doesn&#39;t really cancel reputation in people mind. That&#39;s the second reason why I agree with you&#8230;proactive reputation is essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-5689</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-5689</guid>
		<description>Regular people have right to repair their reputacion, too.
Reputation is what people use to judge your worthiness for career advancement. You must take aggressive action to protect it.&quot; No matter how good, honest or full of integrity you are in your career, accusations of misconduct or mistakes will come your way, particularly if you&#039;re ambitious. 
If it looks like your reputation may suffer a hit, it is time to apply a candid, clear, focused and firm approach to address the situation. Your reputation is what people use to judge your worthiness for career advancement. You must take aggressive action to protect it. 
all that prices are excesive and crazy, that people must be out of their mind.
why they don&#039;t have better and  affordable prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular people have right to repair their reputacion, too.<br />
Reputation is what people use to judge your worthiness for career advancement. You must take aggressive action to protect it.&#8221; No matter how good, honest or full of integrity you are in your career, accusations of misconduct or mistakes will come your way, particularly if you&#8217;re ambitious.<br />
If it looks like your reputation may suffer a hit, it is time to apply a candid, clear, focused and firm approach to address the situation. Your reputation is what people use to judge your worthiness for career advancement. You must take aggressive action to protect it.<br />
all that prices are excesive and crazy, that people must be out of their mind.<br />
why they don&#8217;t have better and  affordable prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Francesconi</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Francesconi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>I agree completely. Proactive management is the best and only way to manage your image effectively.  Although I have heard some argue about the ethicality of the practice of building more sites to counter a bad rep, I think you are just fighting fire with fire and that seems fine to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely. Proactive management is the best and only way to manage your image effectively.  Although I have heard some argue about the ethicality of the practice of building more sites to counter a bad rep, I think you are just fighting fire with fire and that seems fine to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-3045</guid>
		<description>There seem to be services springing up offering to manage the online reputation of celebrities and professionals. I believe one firm charges $25000 per year for a basic service, which would appear to be going rate for a pro-active &quot;Web 2.0&quot; management campaign. &quot;Disaster recovery&quot; is a lot more expensive, than ongoing maintenance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seem to be services springing up offering to manage the online reputation of celebrities and professionals. I believe one firm charges $25000 per year for a basic service, which would appear to be going rate for a pro-active &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; management campaign. &#8220;Disaster recovery&#8221; is a lot more expensive, than ongoing maintenance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>Great point, I just wish more companies understood the benefits of online reputation management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, I just wish more companies understood the benefits of online reputation management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/reputation-repair-versus-reputation-management/#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>for sure, reputation management is cheaper! 
The thing we can&#039;t estimate is public opinion. Some crisis are so strong that even if in google and msn engines, reputation is good, it doesn&#039;t really cancel reputation in people mind. That&#039;s the second reason why I agree with you...proactive reputation is essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for sure, reputation management is cheaper!<br />
The thing we can&#8217;t estimate is public opinion. Some crisis are so strong that even if in google and msn engines, reputation is good, it doesn&#8217;t really cancel reputation in people mind. That&#8217;s the second reason why I agree with you&#8230;proactive reputation is essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
